My overall impressions are below. These are simply my own views and I'm not trying to be controversial for controversy's own sake. As I say each year, I have nothing but respect and thanks for the Warlords and everyone who turns up with a game, and I appreciate the hard work that goes into them.
- It was the year of the terrain mat and the mousemat dice tray. Many of the games were played on the former and it felt like every game had at least one of the latter. [As the owner now of a fairly large collection of mats, from a variety of sources, I can attest to their excellence; one key advantage is easy customization of design.]
- It felt like the show was devoid of large-scale, grand-manner historical games. A group of them suddenly appeared at the far end of the hall, but there seemed fewer than usual (and by a long way). I couldn't see any ACW, which was a first.
- The show now seems dominated by high-concept 25mm (or above) skirmish games, largely sci-fi/fantasy but with more historical games going this route.
- You'd think the market would be saturated by said high-concept sci-fi/fantasy skirmish games, but new ones keep coming out. There were a large number of trader/advert/demo games of this sort and now pretty much every tv and film franchise seems to have it's own "board-game with miniatures" system.
- The impression I had overall on the games is that it's hard not to conclude that historical wargaming is stagnating somewhat - sure, there were still very impressive games, but by-and-large they don't really look any different to the games I saw 10-20 years ago. It's the sci-fi and fantasy games that are always innovating (often in hand with ever more elaborate mdf terrain). Of course, this may well be inevitable: one can't "innovate" with historical battles, as they are what they are and, for example, one large ECW game will always look much like another. New figure lines won't deviate from what historical soldiers looked like, and so historical games from the same period will always look a bit samey for that reason too. That said, I thought the Tonkin game set new standards in terrain design and there were others (see below) that also had excellent terrain.
- I couldn't see various traders that you'd expect at a show like this - no Dave Thomas for second year running, and I couldn't see Front Rank and a few other historical "big beasts".
- I know taking credit cards is not as easy as shoppers think and, yes, there are cash-points at Excel, but this is 2019 and it's not helpful for traders to only take cash. My emergency cash float was wiped out by the second trader I visited and Malc had to bail me out.
- Once you start shopping for sci-fi/fantasy stuff you begin to appreciate just how many traders there are selling products for this market; and some of their products are amazing.
- Wayland Games and other emporiums: you need more aisle space in your shop areas. I literally got stuck a couple of times, the first time with a bloke with a truly enormous rucksack (on his back) who wouldn't stop trying to push his way past me even though he was at risk of knocking over an entire shelf of products (and, frankly, people who don't take their rucksacks off in the shopping areas should be asked to leave, IMHO).
- A special thanks to: (i) Sons of Simon de Montfort for their Warhammer 40K game and looking after Hugo so well; and (ii) Mantic Games for their "lucky dip", which saw Hugo come away with a free Hellboy figure.
Shopping? A Harry Potter Miniatures Game pack of figures for Hugo and some GW Necrons for Monty; Frostgrave stuff from North Star; resin terrain from Ainsty, Coritani and [ ]. This was the first time I've ever been to a show and bought neither historical figures nor books (although I did pick up a set of Warlord plastic Napoleonic Hanoverians free with a WI voucher).
Shopping? A Harry Potter Miniatures Game pack of figures for Hugo and some GW Necrons for Monty; Frostgrave stuff from North Star; resin terrain from Ainsty, Coritani and [ ]. This was the first time I've ever been to a show and bought neither historical figures nor books (although I did pick up a set of Warlord plastic Napoleonic Hanoverians free with a WI voucher).
Here are the photos, with the standard apology to those I inadvertently missed out.
Romans v Boudicca courtesy of "To the Strongest":
Crooked Dice's "7TV Apocalypse" game:
Wargames Association of Reading's "Mammoth Hunt":
Dalauppror's terrific "Battle of Danholm 1807":
Wings of Glory:
Crewe and Nantwich's "Battle of Aughrim 1691":
South London Warlords' Romans v Macedonians game (I have a similar "arid green" cloth mat from Tiny Wargames):
South London Warlords' "The Moon: 2039" game:
Wargamer Poland's Muskovites v Ottomans; a a very colourful, underrated period:
A "Back to the Future" game from Bexley Reapers; there were light shows, apparently (I saw the lightnight strike a couple of times):
Outstanding report, loved the photos. Afraid that is the closet I'll every get to Salute, but it's on the bucket list.
ReplyDeleteCheers
Kevin
Nice report! I like that you brought up some points of discussion. I do have to say, as a former small business owner in the US, it is extremely easy to take credit cards with just a smartphone/tablet and the card reader. As long as you have either cell service or wifi. Really, there is no reason to not have this capability as a business owner.
ReplyDeleteGiles,
ReplyDeleteI highly recommend buying the conversion kits for your X-wing to bring them up to 2.0. It's a far superior game.
Glad to see you and your boys are sharing the hobby!
AJ
Hi!
ReplyDeleteGood point about 'cash only' payments. Two traders last sales from me because of this policy (?). Maybe it is the charge of processing. A lot of pictures. It was tiring enough just walking round!
Great report, Giles. Missed that Muscovite v Turks game which looked great.
ReplyDeleteGlad you liked our Lutzen game. It’s our first teddy bear cloth - still catching up with everyone else :-)
Great pictures Giles, thanks for posting.
ReplyDeleteBest regards
Airhead
Very little to disagree with in your summation.. my first time in 3 years and it seemed pretty much the same as last time except for a little more open space over on the cafe side.. needless to say I enjoyed it enormously despite being 30 years older than the average age and not a sci/fant player!
ReplyDeleteGiles
ReplyDeleteThanks for the kind words on the HYW game - sorry that I missed you!
Although I had little time to view the show, I tend to broadly agree with your summation of the show.
Cheers
Simon.
Purely based on the reports and pictures I've seen, I agree with your assessment 100%. It makes me a little sad - it is difficult to justify visiting a show that is only 1 day (from the west coast of the US) --- but I've been tempted purely because of the level of games on display in the past. Based on this year, there is no way I'd go. Don't get me wrong, a few of the games are awesome looking (e.g. Gingo 40's Tonkin game, Dalauppror's game, etc.).
ReplyDeleteoutstanding report and loved the pictures. especially Old Guard as i'm a member
ReplyDeleteGreat report on an outstanding looking show - thanks for sharing your thoughts and impressions!
ReplyDeletePhotos are great as was the report. Never been to Salute. Maybe someday. I wasn't even aware that there were fantasy/Sci-fi representation at the show. I thought it was historical only. I was quite surprise to see that. Kind of sad in a way.
ReplyDelete