Wednesday, 14 September 2011

10th "1st Silesian" Infantry Regiment (1)


This is the completed first battalion of musketeers of the Prussian 10th Infantry Regiment for 1815. As I understand it, the regular line regiments each had 3 battalions, of which 2 comprised musketeers and the third fusiliers. A detahments of volunteers jaegers is also attached to the battalion. The 10th formed part of von Hacke's 13th Brigade in Bulow's IV Corps. Bulow's troops did not fight at Ligny as they didn't arrive in time, but they were the first substantuial body of Prussians to arrive on the field of Waterloo and were heavily engaged in the battle for Plancenoit.


The General de Brigade order of battle that I use for my 1815 units lists most Prussian infantry units at 32 figures. Full strength would be 40 figures, but allowance is made for the loss of numbers as the Waterloo campaign progressed. However, on the GdB forum Eclaireur suggested that the 32-figure Prussian battalion may be a bit of a myth and that most infantry units at the start of the 1815 campaign would most likely be close to full strength, albeit then deserving of a reduction as a result of battle casualties at Ligny. However, since the 13th Brigade was not at Ligny I decided that it made sense to keep the 10th Infantry at and full strength and 40 figures. With 4 companies of 10 figures each I had to order some extra-large bases from ERM, which Tony delivered with his customary efficiency. The flag is the one that came with the box. It's a bit thicker than GMB flags and I would suggest using PVA rather than Pritt Stick when gluing it together.


The musketeer figures come in 3 parts: the main body, the backpack with half of the greatcoat roll, and the head. I still have the reservations about assembly that I mentioned a while ago when I first started painting these figures. Unless I am doing something wrong, it seems to me that backpack section doesn't quite join the body properly, so that there is a clear gap between the figure's back and the pack. The separate heads are a good idea though, as there are a decent number in the box and you can pose them at different angles to create a lot of variety (which you need in a unit of 40 similarly-posed figures). The jaegers for 10th Infantry require green caps, of which there is 1 head in the box. This is rather limiting for 6 figures, but with different positioning of the heads and eyes looking in different directions you can create a bit of variety; although ultimately they do look rather the same. The only other problem worth mentioning is that the unit bases provided are the usual mix of sizes which don't really meet the requirements of the box. The complete box envisages 4 companies of 10 figures, as I have done; but my origami skills were insufficient to work out how the bases might combine together to support 40 figures in close order.


I found these figures very quick and easy to paint. The Prussian musketeer's uniform is fairly "minimalist" compared to many other Napoleonic uniforms - no long coat tails, lace or fancy braid, for example. As with the Perries' plastic French infantry, I found that these figures took paint very well and, indeed, they Almost Paint Themselves. The trickiest parts for me were painting the breeches and the faces. For the musketeers I used the Foundry "Prussian Blue 66" palette with an additionan highlight of "Deep Blue 20 B". The jaegers' coats were painted with the "French Dragoon Green 70" palette (I think) and for the grey breeches/trousers and blanket rolls I used "Stone 57". I know next to nothing about the Prussian army of 1815 so I'm sure there plenty of minor mistakes, for which I apologise.


All together I am very pleased with these figures. They are cheap and quick to finish, which is exactly what is needed for Napoleonic infantry. Strongly recommended.


46 figures. Painted July and August 2011.












15 comments:

  1. Very nice unit. I really like your painting style - ever thought of doing a tutorial or two?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wonderful looking unit Giles! If you keep this up one day your Nap collection will rival your AWI collection which will be quite a feat of brush!

    Cheers
    Christopher

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow Giles - these are brilliant! Its nice to see a whole box painted up to this standard - very inspiring. I agree with Crazy Joe's comment - a tute on your painting style would be a real treat, particularly on how you do faces. I'm amazed at just how detailed and uniformly good they are - what's the secret huh, huh?
    ;-)

    Cheers,
    Doc

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very nice... and what a coincidence:

    http://saxondog.blogspot.com/2011/09/1st-silesia-infantry-regiment.html

    .. :o))

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lovely painting Giles. Very impressive unit.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great work Giles! I'll be collecting the three Bn's as well.

    David

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great looking unit Giles well done!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Cracking looking unit Giles,
    I am still resisting buying 28mm Perry plastics but when you see them done as nice as this it is very hard!
    Cheers
    Paul

    ReplyDelete
  9. Giles, I think this is your best looking unit ever!

    My German girlfriend (don't tell the wife) is really pushing me to paint some of these!

    ReplyDelete
  10. excellent work they look really nice. I've posted a answer to you colours question under it on my site
    Cheers
    Kent

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great painting and basing..love your work

    ReplyDelete
  12. Very nice army!
    The overall impression is superb ...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hey what happened to the photos you posted of this great unit - I went in to look at them and they disappeared???

    ReplyDelete
  14. Admiring the commitment you put into your blog and in depth insight you present here. It’s nice to find a blog every once in a while that is not all the same outdated rehashed information. Excellent work! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your site link to my Bookmarks today. Imagine, I love your website so much that I would like to advertise my own site on it

    ReplyDelete